Ken Priore The writing · kenpriore.com
Foundations · 2026-09-23 · 1 min read

AI Alignment and Fiduciary Obligation

Benjamin Lange reads alignment as a fiduciary obligation the developer owes the user, built from four classic duties.

AI Alignment and Fiduciary Obligation

Benjamin Lange's new paper reframes the whole alignment question. I think he's right.

Alignment becomes a fiduciary obligation the developer owes the user, with real criteria pulled from four old duties: loyalty, care, good faith, and candour.

One line jumped out: under the duty of care, staying ignorant of harm you could have caught is itself the breach. That moves the alignment debate onto legal ground, which is a healthier place to have it.

AI Alignment and Fiduciary Obligation
Reframes AI alignment as a fiduciary obligation developers owe users, deriving alignment criteria from loyalty, care, good faith, and candour.
← PreviousMCP: The Standard that Decides Legal AI's Future
On the record
Follow
Check your inbox to confirm.