Assessing agentic AI risks with multi-layered governance
Agentic AI demands a different approach to governance—proactive, structured, layered.
Associate General Counsel at Docusign - Product and Partners - Strategic Legal Advisor | AI & Product Counsel | Driving Ethical Innovation at Scale
Agentic AI demands a different approach to governance—proactive, structured, layered.
With AI regulation lagging, forward-thinking organizations can bridge the gap through robust internal governance frameworks, ensuring ethical AI development while gaining competitive advantage
Agentic AI fails due to unrealistic expectations about automation capabilities, poor use case selection, data quality problems across multiple sources, and governance gaps requiring custom solutions.
Companies seeing real returns from AI agents build measurement systems alongside the technology, treating deployment as architectural decisions rather than bolt-on solutions.
And for everyone involved, meaningful change in legal operations happens through evolution, not revolution.
Florida State University researchers found AI buzzwords are seeping into spontaneous speech through unconscious learning, potentially creating algorithmic influence over how we frame ideas and express thoughts.
Generic models are giving way to deep integrations where AI development happens inside the enterprise
I keep seeing teams conflate AI agents with agentic AI, and this distinction matters more than most realize. One's a contained service; the other's a network of intelligent actors making collective decisions.