Signals are quick snapshots of emerging changes in AI, law, and technology—highlighting patterns to notice before they fully unfold.
Justice Kagan's surprise at Claude's constitutional analysis reveals an irony: while we fixate on AI hallucinations, we miss when machines reason more systematically than humans, modeling dispassionate legal analysis.
Legal AI adoption isn't just about efficiency gains—it's about positioning for a market where early adopters build compounding advantages that become nearly impossible for late adopters to overcome.
Altman's admission about ChatGPT's confidentiality problem exposes a fundamental design flaw: AI systems that encourage professional-level trust without professional-level legal protections.
Law schools teach AI verification skills through hands-on training. Yale students build models then hunt for hallucinations. Penn gives 300 students ChatGPT access. Early movers create graduates who understand AI capabilities.
Companies that succeed with AI agents aren't just automating tasks—they're choosing between rebuilding workflows around agents or adapting agents to existing human patterns. The key is knowing which approach drives adoption.
A new analysis from the Future of Privacy Forum questions assumptions about how Large Language Models handle personal data. Yeong Zee Kin, CEO of the…
Technical accuracy gets you to functional. User comprehension gets you to transformational.
That's the real tension for product teams—every safety guardrail you remove increases utility but also increases the blast radius when something slips through.
