The professional privilege gap in conversational AI
Altman's admission about ChatGPT's confidentiality problem exposes a fundamental design flaw: AI systems that encourage professional-level trust without professional-level legal protections.
Signals are quick snapshots of emerging changes in AI, law, and technology—highlighting patterns to notice before they fully unfold.
Altman's admission about ChatGPT's confidentiality problem exposes a fundamental design flaw: AI systems that encourage professional-level trust without professional-level legal protections.
Law schools teach AI verification skills through hands-on training. Yale students build models then hunt for hallucinations. Penn gives 300 students ChatGPT access. Early movers create graduates who understand AI capabilities.
Companies that succeed with AI agents aren't just automating tasks—they're choosing between rebuilding workflows around agents or adapting agents to existing human patterns. The key is knowing which approach drives adoption.
A new analysis from the Future of Privacy Forum questions assumptions about how Large Language Models handle personal data. Yeong Zee Kin, CEO of the…
Technical accuracy gets you to functional. User comprehension gets you to transformational.
That's the real tension for product teams—every safety guardrail you remove increases utility but also increases the blast radius when something slips through.
AI agents need reliability built into their architecture from day one to avoid the ongoing "reliability tax" of operational breakdowns, legal exposure, and reputational damage from unreliable autonomous systems.
Harvey's new alliance program with Stanford, UCLA, NYU, Michigan, and Notre Dame